a question to ask

sometimes when you stroll down a beach you can’t help the primary science curriculum coming to mind … yes I know … sad isn’t it … but this was the thought …


The PoS requires all parts of working scientifically to lead to substantive subject knowledge but in the knowledge sections there are several examples where no understanding of science is required, just the observing of effects e.g. electrostatics Y6 (no explanation required), making a magnet Y3 (no explanation required), describe movement of the Sun across the sky Y1 (real cause not to be taught). How can this inconsistency be justified?


… perhaps one to put any DfE person/MP/anyone who could help/passing stranger.


About annegoldsworthy

Primary Science specialist. Going for more independent thinking and less being told what to think. And that goes for teachers as well as children. We need to change that draft curriculum for science. Follow me on twitter @afgoldsworthy
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s